| Home | About Psi Omega | Benefits | Calendar | Frater | Chapter | Alumni | Council | Directory | Gift Shop | Feedback |
![]() |
||
|
|
|
|
Scientific Article 2 Recovery
Capabilities of Cryopreserved Irradiated Orofacial Bone Marrow Stromal
Stem Cells
|
|
|
|
|
Abstract
Background Orofacial BMSCs isolated from maxilla and mandible have been shown to have superior proliferative and osteogenic properties compared to iliac crest BMSCs [3]. This may relate to their different embryological origins. The craniofacial bones have dual mesodermal and neural crest origins. The maxilla, mandible including alveolar bone, dentin, pulp and periodontal ligament are formed exclusively from neural crest cells, while axial (iliac crest) and appendicular bones are formed from mesoderm. These developmental differences may imply the existence of site-specific properties of progenitor cells in bone marrow that may confer some advantage to orofacial cells with respect to recovery from irradiation. This study will investigate the hypothesized superior recovery capabilities of orofacial BMSCs over iliac crest BMSCs. |
Methods 2.
Cell Irradiation 3.
Cell Viability 4.
Cell Cycle Analysis 5.
p53 Expression by RT-PCR |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
Page 2 6.
Alkaline phosphatase assay
Figure 1. Effect of irradiation and cryopreservation on human bone marrow stromal stem cells (BMSCs). Cryopreserved irradiated BMSCs from the three skeletal sites adhered to culture dish and proliferated with 24hrs. Compared to iliac crest, the maxilla and mandible cells displayed fewer floating dead cells and more spindle-shaped fibroblast morphology.
Figure 2. Proliferation of bone marrow stromal cells subjected to 5 Gy ionizing radiation and cryopreserved was assessed by WST-1 assay. Based on the statistical significance of the data, there was no significant difference in survival of control and cryopreserved-irradiated maxilla and mandible cells. Iliac crest cells showed an apparent increase in metabolic activity after irradiation, suggesting the possible upregulation of cellular activity to compensate for the damage sustained by irradiation and cryopreservation.
Figure 3. Cell cycle analysis of cryopreserved-irradiated cells. Compared with control, the three cell types recovered from the effects of both irradiation and cryopreservation. There were more sub-G0 iliac crest cells (see bar) that indicate possible more apoptotic iliac crest cells compared with maxilla and mandible cells. |
Figure 4. Alkaline phosphatase (ALP) assay indicated higher ALP activity in maxilla and mandible cells subjected to 5 Gy ionizing radiation and cryopreservation compared to iliac crest cells, an indication of better osteogenic recovery capacity of maxilla and mandible cells.
Figure 5. Real Time -PCR analysis using optimized p53. Results were normalized using GAPDH control primers. p53 mRNA levels decreased after irradiation in the maxilla and iliac crest cells, but showed no difference in expression in mandible. p53 has been shown to function in varying manners, depending on downstream transcriptions factors, and so further investigation must be conducted to demonstrate the role of p53 in maxilla, mandible, and iliac crest after irradiation and cryopreservation. However, the decreased values of p53 expression in maxilla and iliac crest demonstrates that p53 does play a role in their cell recovery. Conclusion
Acknowledgements
References
[2] Mazur L, Augustynek A, Halicka HD, Deptala A. Induction of apoptosis in bone marrow cells after treatment of mice with WR-2721 and gamma-rays: relationship to the cell cycle. Cell Biol Toxicol 2003; 19(1): 13-27. [3] Akintoye SO, Lam T, Shi S, Brahim J, Collins MT, and Robey PG. Bone 2006; 38: 758-768. |
|
|
| Psi
Omega Fraternity |
Telephone:
(843) 556-0573 |
| < Previous - Next > |